Webdunia - Bharat's app for daily news and videos

Install App

NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad's 'Sanatan Dharma ruined India' remark ignites storm

UNI
Sunday, 3 August 2025 (14:43 IST)
Mumbai: A political storm has erupted in Maharashtra following controversial remarks by NCP-SCP MLA Jitendra Awhad, who has said that "Sanatan Dharma has ruined India," labeling its ideology as "perverted."

The comments came hours after a special NIA court acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, reigniting the debate about "saffron terror" narrative.

Addressing media, Awhad launched a scathing critique of Sanatan Dharma, alleging historical oppression. "This so-called Sanatan Dharma denied Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj his coronation, defamed Sambhaji Maharaj, and attempted to assassinate social reformers like Jyotirao Phule. It's the same ideology that threw filth at Savitribai Phule and barred Dr Ambedkar from education."

The Thane legislator praised Ambedkar for burning Manusmriti, calling its creator a product of "this perverted Sanatani tradition."

The remarks drew immediate flak from BJP leaders, with MP Sambit Patra recalling Congress' use of the term "saffron terror." "Former home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde admitted being pressured by Congress leadership to use this phrase," Patra said, alleging the Gandhi family orchestrated this narrative. His comments referenced Shinde's 2013 speech at a Congress conclave where he first used the controversial terminology.

The political sparring has followed Thursday's court verdict that cleared all accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast which left six people dead and 95 others injured. The NIA court ordered Rs 2 lakh compensation for victims' families and Rs 50,000 for the injured, while noting the prosecution's failure to prove charges under UAPA and Arms Act beyond reasonable doubt.

The acquitted include retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, and self-styled Shankaracharya Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi.
Legal observers note the judgment examined 331 witnesses over 15 years before concluding the case lacked evidentiary strength. The verdict has intensified discussions about investigative accountability and the politicization of terror cases, with many parties questioning whether the Malegaon probe unfairly targeted Hindu activists.

Related Article

See All

Top News

Bijnor: Maid caught on CCTV urinating in glass and sprinkling on other utensils

India: Supreme Court halts stray dog removals in New Delhi

The Simpsons Predictions That Came True in 2025

Must Read

Landslides and mudslides: Can they be prevented?

Fungi are adapting to body heat — a 'doomsday scenario'

Could a Syrian war criminal be attending Paris Olympics?

Next Article
Show comments